Business Communication Different Decision-Making

Question: Describe about the Business Communication for Different Decision-Making. Answer: Group 1 Different decision-making techniques have the potentiality to develop the results and effectiveness of the decisions. According to Hwang and Yoon (2012), decision-making techniques involve major categories such as intuition based, analytical and random. As this group is a medium-large group, therefore it requires quantitative, clear and transparent viewpoints regarding the decision-making. This group should follow consensus decision making, which is a dynamic and creative way of attaining the basic agreement in between every existing member of the group. This group should use consensus decision making in order to find effectives solutions to the critical problems within the group. Triantaphyllou (2013) has mentioned that consensus decision making involves transparent ideas, concerns and opinions of every associated individual within the group for listening to everybody in proper manner. As this particular group is medium-large group, therefore, this group should follow classroom-sitting arrangement. Following this specific sitting plan, the problem-solving solving groups can discuss the relevant information regarding the critical problems. Classroom sitting arrangement has the potentiality to mitigate and identify the possible distraction, which can help to streamline own knowledge and boost the entire productivity of the group. The interaction process is more transparent in this kind of sit plan than the other existing one. The leader usually discusses problems with te group member and asks for their effective suggestions on it. Classroom sitting arrangement enhances various skills of the team member involving communication, cooperation, teamwork and reflection, which are perfect for the career progression. It also encourages group discussion and work. Group 2 This group should follow brainstorming, which is a perfect combination of discussion and problem solving. As this is a small group, where the members hardly know each other, therefore, the decision-making techniques should be innovative and creative enough to solve critical problems (Thiel et al. 2012). As this problem-solving group is small, therefore, it should follow nominal group techniques in order to generate potential ides. The leader of this group should note down every suggested ideas of the team member for the entire decision-making process. Even the team members are allowed to vote for some suggestions according to their choice. On certain cases, only the leader or business experts grant the most voted option or choices during decision-making. The sitting arrangement of this problem-solving group should sit in a meeting room in order to take effective decisions for further success of an organisation. This group should seat in a round table as it fosters a perfect feeling and notion of the contribution from every participants of this group. Even this particular sit plans also suggest the equal contribution of every group member (Chiclana et al. 2013). The round table arrangements also make easier to contribute ideas and suggestions, as there is no higher sitting arrangement for leader or head individual in this sit plan. This sit plan reflects equality and high-level of interaction in between the existing members of the group. This recommendation of decision-making techniques and sit plan are appropriate enough for this problem-solving group. References Chiclana, F., GarcA, J.T., del Moral, M.J. and Herrera-Viedma, E., 2013. A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making.Information Sciences,221, pp.110-123. Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., 2012.Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey(Vol. 186). Springer Science Business Media. Thiel, C.E., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L., Johnson, J.F. and Mumford, M.D., 2012. Leader ethical decision-making in organizations: Strategies for sensemaking.Journal of Business Ethics,107(1), pp.49-64. Triantaphyllou, E., 2013.Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study(Vol. 44). Springer Science Business Media.